Occam vs Transputers

From: Sture Carlson (sture.carlson_at_email.domain.hidden)
Date: 2000-09-22 13:39:18

• Next message: Lawrence Dickson: "Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection""
• Previous message: P.H.Welch: "Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection""

Dear sirs,
I have now been a member of the Occam mailing group for a while,
but I have still not seen any discussions concerning Occam.
We are using Occam in a Transputer system, but it seems that
noone is using this combination any more.

Please remove me from the Occam (and Java-threads?) mailing list.

-- 
Hälsningar/Best regards  Sture Carlson 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sture Carlson, Senior Systems Engineer  Tel. +46 13 18 65 64
Saab Dynamics AB                        FAX: +46 13 18 64 26 
SE-581 88  LINKOPING, Sweden   mailto:Sture.Carlson_at_dynamics.saab.se

• Next message: Lawrence Dickson: "Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection""
• Previous message: P.H.Welch: "Re: "No aliasing = no garbage collection""

Original text of this message