From: Vasiliu Bogdan <bogdan@scl.ameslab.gov>
Newsgroups: comp.parallel.mpi
Subject: Re: LAM vs. MPICH
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 13:15:02 -0600
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
Message-Id: <365079B6.B3742847@scl.ameslab.gov>
References: <364C00E2.2876EEBD@cranfield.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Please disregard my previous message. I did the ping-pong test again
using "-c2c -O -nger" as command line arguments for the mpirun
command and LAM's bandwidth went up to 84 Mbits/second.
I apologize for this error.

Best regards,
Bogdan



Yon Han CHONG wrote:

> What's your option on LAM and MPICH. I have seen posts to this newsgroup
> talking about mixing and match LAM and MPICH. What are the advantages? I
> am especially interested in performance on a Linux dluster but any
> comment will be welcomed.
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yon Han Chong                     |
> Flow Control and Prediction Group | Tel: + 44 1234 750 111 ext. 5420
> Cranfield College of Aeronautics  | E-mail: Y.H.Chong@cranfield.ac.uk
> Cranfield University              | Fax: + 44 1234 752 149
> United Kingdom                    | Mobile: + 44 958 381 395
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------