Message-Id: <36B966E6.F5E27A60@dolphinics.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 09:22:46 +0000
From: James Cownie <jcownie@dolphinics.com>
Organization: Dolphin Interconnect Solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.parallel.pvm,comp.parallel.mpi
Subject: Re: Switching HUB for beowulf cluster?
References: <78osd7$9ji$1@news.kren.nm.kr>
    <78piue$lrv$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Xref: ukc comp.parallel.pvm:7967 comp.parallel.mpi:4584


Nick Maclaren wrote:
> 

> |> 2. How much is the need for 100Mbps bandwidth for a beowulf cluster?
> |> Will 10M bps only switching hub be ok for clustering or
> |> will 100M bps switching hub lead to better overall performance?
> 
> In terms of latency, there is no difference.  In terms of bandwidth,
> a lot.  As the extra expense of 100M bps is now small, I advise
> going for that.

The reason for using a switching hub, rather than a simple contention
hub
is to increase the bi-sectional bandwidth.

The latency difference (between teh two hubs) is likely unmeasurable at
the
MPI level, and the point to point bandwidth will also be the same. 
However a switching hub will allow many simultaneous communications.
This can be very important for the overall performance of your
application.

-- Jim 

James Cownie	<jcownie@etnus.com>
Etnus, Inc.     +44 117 9071438
http://www.etnus.com

