From: Greg Pfister <pfister@NOusSPAM.ibm.com>
Newsgroups: comp.parallel
Subject: Re: Transparent Parallel Machine?
Date: 3 Jun 1999 16:06:37 GMT
Organization: IBM Global Services, South, RTP, NC, US
Approved: bigrigg@cs.cmu.edu
Message-Id: <7j696d$mnn$1@goldenapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu>
Originator: bigrigg@ux6.sp.cs.cmu.edu
Xref: ukc comp.parallel:15643


Niall Dalton wrote:
> btw. see http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/mosix to download/get more info on Mosix.

From a quick pass over that web site and a look at one of the
most recent papers (Mosix on Linux), I conclude that Mosix does
not attempt to address high availability. Is that a correct
interpretation?

Greg Pfister
<not my employer's opinion>

--
Articles to bigrigg+parallel@cs.cmu.edu (Admin: bigrigg@cs.cmu.edu)
Archive: http://www.hensa.ac.uk/parallel/internet/usenet/comp.parallel